The Nanobot Narrative

You’ve been told there are “nanobots in your blood” and that these sinister machines have been secretly inserted to monitor, control, or even reprogram you. But the truth is exactly the opposite: what’s being passed off as “nanotechnology” under the microscope are artifacts, crystals, and ordinary blood structures long known to science.

In this episode of The True Health Report, Dr. Andrew Kaufman sits down with experts in microscopy and nanotechnology to dismantle this false narrative. Together, they reveal how simple biological phenomena have been twisted into terrifying stories of microchips, circuitry, and graphene oxide.

Fear-Based Fraud

Darkfield and live blood microscopy can show fascinating patterns, shapes, and forms. But these images have been misinterpreted and weaponized to push fear and sell false solutions.

Salt crystals, protein clumps, and natural blood structures are being claimed as “evidence” of nanotech. Yet you cannot identify a material’s composition by appearance alone. What looks like circuitry is nothing more than the body’s own processes, misunderstood and sensationalized.

This misinformation doesn’t just confuse, but it causes real harm. It drives people toward unnecessary (and sometimes dangerous) treatments, and it keeps fear alive instead of fostering healing.

Suppressed Science and Hidden Truth

For over a century, scientists like Antoine Béchamp and Gaston Naessens documented pleomorphic forms (tiny living entities within the blood) without ever calling them “machines.” These discoveries have been suppressed and ridiculed, while today’s misread microscope slides are used as evidence of high-tech implants.

The truth? Our bodies are far more complex, adaptive, and natural than these fear-driven stories allow. What’s being sold as “nanobot evidence” is nothing more than a misrepresentation of reality, and one that distracts from true healing.

Free Resource: Dr. Kaufman’s Ultimate Detox Protocol

Knowing the truth is only the first step. Step two is protecting and strengthening your body against the real drivers of disease. Not imaginary “nanobots,” but chronic toxic exposure.

 Dr. Kaufman’s Ultimate Detox Protocol is a free 30-day roadmap that shows you how to:


• Reduce real toxic exposures (plastics, PFAS, pesticides, heavy metals, and other chemical burdens)
• Support natural elimination pathways (sweating, liver support, bowel and kidney health)
• Rebuild metabolic resilience and immune competence through targeted nutrition and restorative practices

  

By clearing out genuine pollutants, strengthening your detox systems, and learning how to read the evidence (not panic at images), you stop feeding the narrative of helplessness and reclaim practical control over your health.



Download the protocol for free here:

https://akmd.co/microscope-blog 

Timestamps

0:00:00 – Dr. Kaufman rips the veil off the nanotech-in-blood scare

0:02:21 – Dr. Marizelle Arce exposes what real microscopy looks like

0:02:53 – Dr. Anna Maria Oliva calls out lab reality vs. viral nanotech myths

0:03:15 – Adam & Josh Bigelsen reveal the family legacy that refuses to be hijacked by fear

0:04:47 – Live-blood basics: how to spot truth instead of manufactured terror under the microscope

0:12:56 – Why ordinary microscopes can’t prove the nanotech fantasy

0:29:03 – Old microscope images that blow apart the modern panic narrative surrounding nanotech and graphene oxide

0:39:46 – Strange particles explained (not proof of a plot, just misreadings)

0:55:05 – Terrainology conference preview: real medicine, not manufactured fear

0:59:10 – Microscopy reality check: debunking the nano hysteria with calm precision

1:00:37 – The Bigelsens on guarding scientific integrity against sensationalism

1:03:54 – Kaufman’s final verdict: question the narrative and reclaiming your reasoning
 

Links

Reserve your spot at the Terrainology Conference (Sept 26–28):
https://www.universityofterrain.com/terrainology

Holographic Blood: A New Dimension in Medicine by Harvey Bigelsen:
https://www.amazon.com/Holographic-Blood/dp/097742149X

Germs Are Not Our Enemy: Why the New Terrain Medicine Is Best for Optimal Health by Marizelle Arce:
https://www.amazon.com/Germs-Are-Not-Our-Enemy/dp/B0F8XX2FVG

Discover more at the University of Terrain:
https://www.universityofterrain.com/home-lut-en
  

Transcript

Are nanoparticles and nanomachines in our blood? Today we’re going to answer that question in a clear and definitive way. I’m Dr. Andrew Kaufman, and this is the True Health Report. I’m joined by an esteemed panel of experts in microscopy, natural healing, and nanotechnology.

Since the rollout of the COVID injections, many well-intentioned people have been trying to uncover the truth about what our governments might be doing to us. While we all agree there’s significant toxicity from these shots, we’ve also seen a flood of claims—about nanotechnology, hydrogels, frequency devices, and other microscopic findings in both the vaccine solutions and in blood. Some of these claims, however, are based on errors or misinterpretations of what’s actually being seen under the microscope.

Our goal today is to bring balance to this conversation. We’ll share insights into microscopy: how it works, how to interpret what you see, and how to avoid common pitfalls. Blood analysis using microscopy isn’t new—it’s been practiced long before COVID—and today’s panel brings decades of experience to help put things into perspective.

Let’s start by introducing everyone.

Dr. Marizelle Arce: Hello everyone, I’m Dr. Marizelle Arce, a naturopathic doctor and terrain educator. I’ve been in practice for nearly twenty years and have been working with microscopes for much of that time. My mother was an electron microscopist, so I learned early on. My work is heavily based on pleomorphism and the pioneering studies of Enderlein.

Dr. Anna Maria Oliva: I’m Anna Maria Oliva. I have a PhD in biomedicine and worked for years in a nanobioengineering lab. I’m not a medical doctor, but I’ve seen firsthand how nanotechnology is applied to medicine.

Adam Bigelsen: Thanks for inviting us, Andy. My brother Josh and I continue the work of our father, Dr. Harvey Bigelsen, who made major contributions in alternative medicine, including helping write the law legitimizing homeopathy in the U.S. He was also one of the first doctors to examine live blood under a microscope. Josh and I grew up immersed in his work and have been studying live blood for decades.

Josh Bigelsen: I’ve been behind the microscope almost nonstop since 2001. Over the years, I’ve recognized countless patterns and tried to help people understand how nature works—that we evolve through symbiosis, not antagonism.

Dr. Kaufman: Wonderful. Let’s begin by educating our audience about “live blood analysis”—a proprietary term, but here we’re simply talking about examining blood that hasn’t been chemically fixed or stained. Instead, the blood is still alive on the slide. What are the key aspects of this practice, and how does it differ from conventional microscopy?

Dr. Marizelle Arce: The basic technique is simple: prick your finger, place a drop of blood on a slide, cover it with a slip, and observe it under a microscope. But there’s an important distinction. Conventional medicine stains the blood with dyes, fixing it into a static image. In live or nutritional microscopy, we observe blood in motion—cells alive, plasma flowing, structures forming. Interpretation, however, varies widely, and not all approaches are equal.

Adam Bigelsen: Exactly. Our father used darkfield microscopy but with a very different philosophy from standard “live blood analysis.” What we do is unique. We don’t stain or alter the sample with oils or filters—we simply place the drop on the slide and observe. That purity allows us to recognize reproducible patterns, which is the essence of our work.

Dr. Kaufman: And this is where much confusion arises. While many agree on the basics—a red blood cell is a red blood cell, a white blood cell is a white blood cell—interpretation diverges sharply. Some practitioners superimpose conventional ideas onto live images, often leading to speculation or even fear-based conclusions. Errors also creep in during sample preparation, slide handling, or even just by misidentifying artifacts as something sinister.

Dr. Oliva: And here’s a crucial point: you cannot see nanotechnology with a microscope. A microscope shows microns, not nanoscale structures. Many people have mislabeled salt crystals, fibers, or simple drying patterns as “nanocircuits” or “hydrogels.” That is not science. Words have specific definitions—hydrogel, for example, is well defined in the literature. To see people reassign meanings or invent properties like “self-replicating hydrogels” is deeply misleading.

Dr. Kaufman: Exactly. Science is about reproducibility and context. What we’re seeing now is a lot of fear-driven interpretations, cherry-picking images, or taking poor samples and mistaking artifacts for advanced technology. Historically, though, many of these structures were documented long before COVID. There is nothing new or alien about them.

Adam Bigelsen: Right. We’ve seen these same images for decades. My father documented them, Enderlein documented them, even early microscopists. Some of the things being called “graphene” today were photographed in the 1980s, long before graphene was invented. To claim they’re new nanostructures is simply false.

Dr. Kaufman: And when you remember that capillaries are narrower than red blood cells—only one can pass through at a time—you realize that many of these supposed “nanobots” or “circuits” would be physically impossible to exist in living blood.

Dr. Oliva: That’s right. And we must stress: you cannot determine the composition of a substance from an image. Analytical chemistry requires rigorous testing and preparation, not just looking under a lens and making assumptions.

Dr. Kaufman: In short, what we’ve shown here is that much of the fear around “nanotech in the blood” stems from misinterpretation, lack of training, or projection of pre-existing narratives. These are not new phenomena. They are not evidence of circuitry or hydrogels or nanobots. They are artifacts, crystals, or naturally occurring microzymas—tiny living particles described by Bechamp, Enderlein, and others, long before today’s debates.

And this is the key takeaway: your body is not being infiltrated by hidden machines. The images people are using to spread fear are either artifacts or misinterpreted natural phenomena. Real science demands critical thinking, context, reproducibility, and humility.